Siu Yan Kok, Chui Ping Florey LAM and Pui Yin Tracy Tang
Published Date: 2022-03-04Siu Yan Kok1*, Chui Ping Florey LAM1 and Pui Yin Tracy Tang2
1Department of Science in Health Service Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2Departmen t of Science in Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Received date: December 22, 2021, Manuscript No. IPJCC-21-12132; Editor assigned date: December 23, 2021, PreQC No. IPJCC-21-12132 (PQ);Reviewed date: January 06, 2022, QC No. IPJCC-21-12132; Revised date: February 23, 2022, Manuscript No. IPJCC-21-12132 (R); Published date: March 04, 2022, DOI: 10.36648/2471-9943/22.8.001
Citation: Kok SY, Florey Lam CP, Tang PYT (2022) To Evaluate the Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Therapy in Optimizing Anemia in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Closed Loop Audit of this Pilot Programme. Colorec Cancer Vol:8 No:3
Background: Treatment of preoperative anemia is recommended aiming to minimize perioperative allogenic red blood cell transfusion. This study aims to analyses and evaluate the efficacy of administration Intravenous iron infusion (IV Iron) in preoperative optimization of anemic patients with colorectal cancer in a Pilot Programme. A close loop Audit of the programme is also conducted.
Methods: A Multidisciplinary Team was formed. Colorectal cancer patients with anemia and met the inclusion criteria were included. IV Iron was given at least 4 weeks before operation. Hemoglobin (Hb) and iron profile were collected as baseline, preoperation, postop Day 1, before discharge and 26 weeks after IV Iron give. Primary Outcome was need for blood transfusion, change in Hb and Fe profile level. Secondary Outcome was 2 Audit Cycles of this programme, postoperative morbidity, 30 Days mortality, hospital stay, safety profile and change in Hb level and anemic symptom 26 weeks after IV Iron.
Results: 214 patients were included with 183 patients proceeded to operation (1 Jan 2017-1 Feb 2021). 3.27%, 4.92% and 3.27% required preop, intraop and postoperation blood transfusion respectively. 94.9% had raised in Hb, the median increase in Hb was 2.35 g/dL. There was also raised in Fe and ferritin of 3 and 332 respectively. This showed that IV Iron had the effect of reduction of preoperative blood transfusion from 20% to 3.27% (when compared with our retrospective review of cases 2014-16). When compared with pre IV Iron Hb, there was an increase in 4 g/dL in Hb 26 weeks after IV Iron. The percentage of patients with anemic symptom also dropped from 55.1% to 0%.
2 Audit cycles were conducted with improvement in recruitment rate from 49% to 100% and compliance rate.
Conclusion: Our data demonstrates that preoperative IV Iron can help reduction of blood transfusion preoperatively. It can also raise the Hb and Iron profile. It also demonstrates the sustainability in terms of Hb level and improvement in anemic symptom. A close loop audit also demonstrates the feasibility of implementing this programme in optimizing anemia in colorectal cancer patients.
Colorectal cancer; Anemia; Intravenous iron; Blood transfusion; Audit
The overall prevalence of anemia in colon cancer is around 48% with moderate to severe anemia found in more than 20% of cases [1]. The type of anemia manifests in colorectal cancer patients is typically assumed to be Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA) caused by tumor bleeding, poor oral intake or impaired iron absorption. It is also common for them to present with inflammatory related anemia of chronic disease [2]. Untreated anemia would lead to increase in surgical morbidity and mortality. Two large prospective observational studies showed IV Iron could correct iron deficiency anemia in cancer patients mainly with mild anemia with baseline hemoglobin levels of 10-11 g/dL. The evidence for IV Iron in cancer patients with moderate (Hb 8-9.9 g/dL) or severe (£ 7.9 g/dL) anemia was limited [3]. Data on the rate of Hb response following IV Iron were also lacking. Blood transfusion though can correct anemia quickly, it may be associated with poorer oncological outcomes and transfusion risks. Avoiding blood transfusions and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in oncological patients seems important because of its association with an increased risk of cancer recurrence and increased mortality. Blood products were of limited supply too [4].
Oral iron has been shown to correct anemia but is slow in absorption rate. It is also poorly tolerated and constipation is the most common side effect. IV Iron provides an alternative in optimizing patients with iron deficiency anemia preoperatively. Iron (III) isomaltoside (Monofer) is a form of IV Iron which is more effective than oral iron in treating anemia [4].
Retrospective review of our cases (2014-2016), up to 20% colorectal cancer patients required preoperative blood transfusion. In view of this our unit initiated the quality improvement pilot programme of anemia screening and optimisation in all colorectal cancer patients on 1 Feb 2017. Our aim was to optimize Hb and reduce blood transfusion preoperation. We would also like to see a longer term effect of IV Iron on anemic symptom and Hb level in 26 weeks after IV Iron given.
The quality improvement team consisted of colorectal surgeons, anaesthetists, hematologists, colorectal cancer and ward nurses. We aim at screening all newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients for iron deficiency anemia and IV Iron will be given for optimization. For those preoperative patients, IV Iron will be given to them at least 4 weeks before operation. Blood tests will be repeated 2 weeks after IV Iron given and 2nd dose of IV Iron will be given for those with suboptimal increase in Hb and Fe profile. Hb and Fe profile will be repeated preoperation, 1 day after operation, day before discharge and 26 weeks after diagnosis. Patient’s anemic symptom will also be screened. 2 Audit cycles were conducted to assess the efficacy and compliance to the Pilot Programme.
There is no publication on Audit on IV Iron therapy in optimizing colorectal cancer patients only so far. In our paper, we would also compare the patient’s characteristic of those IV iron responder with those non-responder in terms of Hb change. The patient’s characteristics of those who received 1 dose versus more than 1 dose of IV iron were also compared.
In this paper, we AIM at: To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous iron therapy in optimizing anemia in colorectal cancer patients in terms of
Closed loop audits of this Pilot Programme
A multidisciplinary team consisting of surgeons, anaesthetist, colorectal cancer nurses, hematologist were formed and the Pilot Programme started on 1 Feb 2017.
The inclusion criteriaSingle dose infusion of Monofer 500 mg (Amended in 2nd Audit cycle: dosage determined according to body weight: 1000 mg Monofer for >50 kg from 1 Jan 2019)
Infusion rate: 60 minutes
Infusion to be given can be repeated 2 week later if clinically indicated (Hb<8 g/dL or anemic symptoms clinically)
Blood testsCBP D/C reticulocyte, LRFT CaPO4 LDH, Fe TIBC Ferritin as baseline and repeat 2 weeks after IV Iron given and before operation. Haemoglobin level was monitored on postoperation Day 1, before discharge and 26 weeks after IV Iron therapy.
Caution and give steroid prophylaxis if the patient has the followingHistory of asthma, allergic eczema or urticarial and any history of drug allergy.
Steroid prophylaxisOral Prednisolone 40 mg 12 hours and 2 hours before iron infusion (If oral route not feasible, then give hydrocortisone 200 mg ivi 12 hours and 2 hours before iron infusion.)
Nursing observationCheck blood pressure/pulse/SpO2 before infusion and at 0 min, 5 min, 15 min, 60 min from start of infusion.
Check symptoms and signs of allergic drug reaction 30 minutes after completion of infusion.
Possible side effects common (may affect up to 1 in 10 people)Patient recruitment in Colorectal Cancer Clinic
Blood taking (CBP D/C reticulocyte, LRFT CaPO4 LDH, Fe TIBC Ferritin)+screening of inclusion and exclusion criteria+fill in Day Centre referral formàIV Iron infusion appointment within 1 week of referral
On day of infusion in day centre
Patient admitted to day centreàidentity and inclusion and exclusion criteria double checkedàcorrect dosage of IV Iron +/- steroid cover prescribedàVital signs monitoring before, throughout and after the infusionàMonitor for adverse reaction
2 weeks after IV Iron therapy
Repeat blood taking (CBP D/C reticulocyte, LRFT CaPO4 LDH, Fe TIBC Ferritin)à arrange 2nd dose of IV Iron therapy if Hb<8 or presence of anemic symptom
26 weeks after IV Iron therapy (to assess sustainability of hemoglobin response):
1st Audit cycle (1 Feb 2017-31 Dec 2018)
2nd Audit cycle (1 Jan 2019–1 Feb 2021)
After formation of the multidisciplinary team, the protocol, checklist for day centre and checklist for doctors were drafted. Team members had regular meeting and case discussion mainly through email due to COVID 19. Data entry was done in a weekly basis. Blood taking was arranged by colorectal surgeons and nurses. An update on the protocol and checklist for day center was done after the 1st Audit cycle. Recruitment rate, compliance rate in terms of IV Iron time given and blood taking, feedback from doctors, nurses and patients were all collected to help programme improvement.
Statistical analysisCategorical data were summarized as number and percentage. Continuous variables were presented as mean, median +/- standard deviation. Independent-samples t tests were used to assess the changes in Hb level and Iron profile. Patients with missing data for any of the primary or secondary outcomes were excluded from analysis. A significance level of 0.05 was considered to be significant.
214 patients were included with IV iron given preoperation. The median age is 72 years old (29-93). 108 Male and 106 Female were included. The mean ASA was 2. Median Body Mass Index was 20.58. Median number of comorbidities was 1 (0-4). 10.75%, 5.61% and 3.27% were taking aspirin, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and warfarin respectively. 42.1% (90/214) presented with gastrointestinal bleeding and 55.1% (118/214) presented with anemic symptom. (Table 1a)
Majority of tumors were located over right colon (37.9%), rectum (33%), left colon (22.4%) respectively. 15/214 (7%) had neoadjuvant therapy. (Table 1a)
Concerning the severity of anemia, 118 (55.1%), 74 (34.6%), 21 (9.8%) had severe (Hb<8), moderate (Hb 8-9.9) and mild anemia (Hb 10-11) respectively. Concerning pre iv iron blood results (Median), Hb: 7.65 g/dl, Ferritin: 30, Fe: 3.85, TIBC: 58, Iron saturation: 6, phosphate: 1.14. Post IV iron blood results (Median) showed Hb: 10.3, 94.9% had raised in Hb, the median increase in Hb was 2.35. Post IV Iron Fe: 7.2, there was increased in Fe: +3, ferritin: 431, there was increase in ferritin +332, (Table 1b)
The median days from IV iron to OT was 18 days. 27 (12.6%) and 187 (87.4%) patients had 500 mg and 1000 mg Monofer respectively. 9 (4.2%) had 2 doses of Monofer preoperation. (Table 1d)
183 patients proceeded to operation whereas 31 patients could not proceed to surgery due to metastatic, progressive disease or multiple comorbidities. 41.5% had right hemicolectomy, 12.6% had total mesorectal excision and sigmoidectomy, 8.74% had anterior resection, 7.7% had transanal total mesorectal excision respectively.
Concerning the approach, 86.9% had laparoscopic surgery whereas 9.29% were converted to open surgery. Nil of them had intraoperation complication.
The median OT time was 190 mins (0-740) and median blood loss was 20 ml (0-250). 47.5% has blood loss<50 ml. (Table 1e)
18% (33/183) required preoperative blood transfusion as preoperative optimization. All 33 of them had severe anemia with Hb<8. 3.27% (6/183) required blood transfusion after IV iron. 4.92% (9/183) had intraoperation blood or blood products transfusion. 8 had packed cell whereas 1 had fresh frozen plasma transfusion. 4 and 5 of them had moderate and severe anemia respectively. (Table 1c)
Postoperation blood (Median) Day 1 Hb 9.5, Hb before discharge 10, Hb 26 weeks posteropation 11.65. 3.27% (6/183) required postoperation blood transfusion. 3 of them moderate and severe anemia respectively. (Table 1b,g)
5.6% had postoperation morbidity. 4.2% were Grade III of Clavien Dindo Classification. 0 had neither readmission nor 30 day mortality. The median hospital stay was 10 days. 59.3% was AJCC stage III. None had postoperation anemic symptom. (Table 1f)
Table 1a: Patient’s Demographics (N=214).
N=214 | ||
---|---|---|
Age | 72 | Median (29-93) |
Sex | Male | 108 |
Female | 106 | |
ASA | 2 | Mean (1-4) |
BMI | 20.58 | Median |
No of comorbidities | 1 | Median (0-4) |
Anticoagulants | Aspirin | 23 (10.75%) |
Warfarin | 7 (3.27%) | |
Plavix | 1 (0.47%) | |
NOAC | 12(5.61%) | |
Combined Drug | 2 (0.93%) | |
Proton pump inhibitor | Yes | 64 (29.9%) |
No | 150 (70.1%) | |
Oral Iron | Yes | 52 (24.3%) |
No | 162 (75.7%) | |
GIB symptom | Yes | 90 (42.1%) |
No | 124 (57.9%) | |
Anemic symptom | Yes | 118 (55.1%) |
No | 96 (44.9%) | |
Tumor location | Right colon | 86 (37.9%) |
Transverse colon | 3 (1.3%) | |
Left colon | 48 (22.4%) | |
Rectum | 75 (33%) | |
2 locations | 2 (0.9%) | |
Neoadjuvant therapy | Yes | 15 (7%) |
No | 199 (93%) | |
Neoadjuvant type | RT | 1 (6.67%) |
Chemo+RT | 14 (93.3%) |
Table 1b: Blood results (Hb, Iron profile, Phosphate).
Hemoglobin | ||
---|---|---|
Pre IV Iron Hb | 7.65 g/dL | Median |
Severity of anemia | mild (10-11) | 21 (9.8%) |
mod (8-9.9) | 74 (34.6%) | |
severe (</=7.9) | 118 (55.1%) | |
Jehovah's witness | 1 (0.5%) | |
Preop Hb (After IV Iron) | 10.3 | Median |
Change in Hb ? | Increase | 203 (94.9%) |
Decrease | 5 (2.3%) | |
No change | 6 (2.8%) | |
Change in Hb | 2.35 | Median |
Postop D1 Hb | 9.5 | Median |
Postop Hb before discharge | 10 | Median |
Iron profile | ||
Pre IV Iron ferritin | 30 ug/L | Median |
Post IV Iron ferritin | 431 | Median |
Change in ferritin | 332 | Median |
Pre IV Iron Fe | 3.85 | Median |
Post IV Iron Fe | 7.2 | Median |
Change in Fe | 3 | Median |
Pre IV Iron TIBC | 58 | Median |
Post IV Iron TIBC | 44 | Median |
Pre IV Iron saturation | 6 | Median |
Post IV Iron saturation | 17 | Median |
Preop phosphate | 1.14 | Median |
Table 1c: Need of blood transfusion (preop, intraop, postoperation).
Preop blood transfusion before iv iron | Yes No |
33 (18%) 150 (82%) |
No. of rbc transfused | 1u | 11.00 (25%) |
2u | 32.00 (72.73%) | |
3u | 1.00 (2.27%) | |
Preop blood transfusion after iv iron | 6 | 3.27% |
Intraop blood/blood product transfusion | Yes No | 9 (4.92%) 174 (95.1%) |
Intraop transfusion | Packed cell | 8 |
Fresh frozen plasma | 1 | |
No. of unit transfused | 1 unit | 1 |
2 units | 5 | |
3 units | 2 | |
4 units | 1 | |
Postop blood transfusion | Yes No |
6(3.27%) 177 (96.73%) |
Postop unit of blood transfused | 1u 2u |
2 4 |
Table 1d: IV Iron therapy details.
Year | Total No. of colorectal cancer patients screened | No. of patients with IV Iron given |
---|---|---|
Days from IV Iron to OT | 18 days | Median |
IV Iron dosage | 500mg | 27 (12.6%) |
1000mg | 187 (87.4%) | |
Adverse reaction after IV Iron infusion | 0 | 0% |
No. of times IV Iron given | 1 time | 205 (95.8%) |
2 times | 9 (4.2%) |
Table 1e: Operative details.
Operation done | Yes No |
183 31 |
Type of operation | Right hemicolectomy | 76 (41.5%) |
Total mesorectal excision (TME) | 23 (12.6%) | |
Sigmoidectomy | 23 (12.6%) | |
Anterior resection | 16 (8.74%) | |
Transanal TME | 14 (7.7%) | |
Left hemicolectomy | 11 (6%) | |
Total colectomy | 8 (4.37%) | |
Colostomy | 8 (4.37%) | |
Abdominoperineal Resection | 4 (2.2%) | |
Hartmann's operation | 2 (1.09%) | |
Transanal Endoscopic Operation | 1 (0.55%) | |
Pelvic exenteration | 1(0.55%) | |
Approach | Lap | 159 (86.9%) |
Open | 9 (4.92%) | |
Lap converted open | 17 (9.29%) | |
Endoanal | 1 (0.55%) | |
OT time | 190 mins | Median (0-740) |
Blood loss | 20 ml | Median (0-250) |
Blood loss level | Low<50 | 87(47.5%) |
Mod50-250 | 74 (40.4%) | |
High>250 | 19 (10.4%) | |
Intraoperation complication | Yes | 0 (0% ) |
No | 183 (100%) |
Table 1f: Postoperative details and pathology.
Hospital stay | 10 days | Median |
---|---|---|
Postop morbidity | Yes No |
12 (5.6%) 202 (94.4%) |
Clavien Dindo Classification | GII GIII |
2 (0.9%) 9 (4.2%) |
Readmission | 0 | 0% |
30-Day Mortality | 0 | 0% |
AJCC staging | 0 1 2 3 4 |
41 (19.2%) 2 (0.9%) 42 (19.6%) 127 (5.3%) 2 (0.9%) |
Table 1g: Hb and symptom 26 weeks postoperation.
Hb 26 wks post IV Iron | 11.65 g/dL | Median |
---|---|---|
Preop anemic symptom | Yes | 118 (55.1%) |
Anemic symptom 26 wks post IV Iron | Yes | 0 (0%) |
post IV Iron |
When compared those patients with increase in Hb level (203) vs. no change in Hb level after IV iron, both groups were comparable in terms of demographics, tumor location, operation, OT time, blood loss, approach, intraoperation complication, preop, intraop and postoperation blood or blood product transfusion and hospital stay.
The pre and post iv iron Hb, Fe, ferritin, Iron saturation and postop Hb before discharge were all significantly higher in no Hb change group than raised in Hb group. (Table 2)
Table 2: Change Hb vs. no change Hb after IV Iron.
Raised Hb (203) | No change/Decrease Hb (11) | Sig 2 tailed | |
---|---|---|---|
IV Iron dosage | 500 mg 22 | 5 | 0.006 |
1000 mg 181 | 6 | ||
Severity of anemia | mild 10-11 17 | 4 | 0.001 |
mod 8-9.9 68 | 6 | ||
severe</=7.9 118 | 0 | ||
Jehovah's witness 0 | 1 | ||
Pre IV Iron Hb | 7.69 | 10.05 | 0.001 |
Pre IV Iron Fe | 4.9 | 9.06 | 0.027 |
Pre IV Iron sat | 8.9 | 17.4 | 0.008 |
Pre IV Iron ferritin | 75.8 | 162.6 | 0.033 |
Preop Hb after IV Iron | 10.31 | 17.65 | <0.05 |
Change in Hb | 2.63 | -0.22 | 0.002 |
Postop Hb before discharge | 9.13 | 11.13 | 0.049 |
AJCC | 0:41 | 0 | 0.04 |
I: 2 | 0 | ||
II: 36 | 6 | ||
III: 122 | 5 | ||
IV: 2 | 0 | ||
26 weeks post IV Iron Anemic symptom | 0 | 0 |
When compared those patient with one vs. two doses of Monofer given, the pre iv iron Hb was significantly lower in the two doses group. The demographics, operative details, pre and post iv iron Fe profile, post iv iron Hb, preoperation, intraoperation and postoperation blood transfusion, hospital stay, morbidity and mortality were all statistically insignificant (Table 3).
Table 3: 1 vs. 2 doses of IV Iron given.
1 dose (205) | 2 doses (9) | Sig 2 tailed | |
---|---|---|---|
ASA | I 2 | 0 | 0.003 |
II 86 | 1 | ||
III 97 | 6 | ||
IV 4 | 2 | ||
Anticoagulant | No 164 | 5 | 0.023 |
aspirin 21 | 2 | ||
warfarin 7 | 0 | ||
plavix 1 | 0 | ||
NOAC 11 | 1 | ||
combined drugs 1 | 1 | ||
Pre IV Iron Hb | 7.86 | 6.64 | 0.034 |
Anemic symptom | 0 | 0 |
Set Standards
Measure current practice
Compare results and standards
Low recruitment rate: Colorectal surgeons forgot to recruit patients. Also many patients were excluded due to Allergy. Patients with history of asthma, allergic eczema or urticaria, drug allergy were excluded in the first audit cycle. No active screening of patients, many patients were missed
Monofer dosage not given according to weight
Change: Adjustment of Monofer according to body weight with dosage increased to 1000 mg for those>50 kg
Forgot blood taking after IV iron given
Change: Colorectal cancer nurses reminded doctors and nurses for baseline and post IV iron blood taking
No 2nd dose given for those failed Hb top up, just proceed to blood transfusion
Change: 2nd dose will be given if rechecked Hb<8 or presence of anemic symptom
Only preliminary checklist is available
Change: A finalized form for I.V iron infusion for doctors, a booking form and checklist were available in Apr 2019
I.V Iron was not given within 1 week as planned
Change: Reminded day care centre for arrangement of IV Iron infusion within 1 week
I.V Iron not referred to be given as day case
Change: Reminded colorectal surgeons and nurses to fill in the referral form and referred cases as day case.
Re-audit audit cycle 2 (1 Jan 2019 – 1 Feb 2021)Table 4: Recruitment of patients for IV Iron therapy.
Year | Total no. of colorectal cancer patients | No. of colorectal cancer patients screened | No. of patients with IV Iron given | Recruitment rate |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 303 | 150 | 15 (10%) | 49.50% |
2018 | 298 | 200 | 37 (18.5%) | 67.10% |
2019 | 314 | 314 | 53 (16.88%) | 100% |
2020 | 310 | 310 | 68 (21.94%) | 100% |
2021 | 226 | 226 | 41 (18.14%) | 100% |
Anemia is one of the most frequent extraintestinal manifestations of colorectal cancer, and may be present in 30-75% of patients. A study on 358 patients with colorectal cancer reported a 25% prevalence of moderate to severe anemia [5-11]. There is also evidence that iron deficiency is associated with poor performance and more advanced disease.
This study demonstrates that preoperative IV Iron is both feasible and efficacious in optimizing anemia in colorectal cancer patients. In our result, 214 patients had IV Iron and 183 proceeded to surgery at the end. 3.27%, 4.92% and 3.27% required preop, intraop and postoperation blood transfusion respectively. 94.9% had raised in Hb, the median increase in Hb was 2.35 g/dL. There was also raised in Fe and ferritin of 3 and 332 respectively. This showed that IV Iron had the effect of reduction of preoperative blood transfusion from 20% to 3.27% (when compared with our retrospective review of cases 2014-16). The improvement in Hb and Iron profile also contributed to the reduction in blood transfusion. Besides, all blood transfusion preoperation were for patients presented with severe anemia (Hb<8 g/dL) which was also shown in previous studies [3,8].
We also noticed a sustainability in the maintenance of Hb level 26 weeks and improvement in anemic symptoms after IV Iron therapy. When compared with pre IV Iron Hb, there was an increase in 4 g/dL in Hb 26 weeks after IV Iron. The percentage of patients with anemic symptom also dropped from 55.1% to 0%. A recent retrospective review [10,13] also showed a better outcome after administering IV Iron which resulted in continuous increase in Hb level during early post-operative period after colorectal cancer surgery. Our results add to a growing body of evidence in the literature demonstrating the efficacy of preoperative IV Iron therapy in colorectal cancer patients [12].
Concerning the safety profile, no adverse reaction was noticed in all patients. When compared the group with Hb change vs. no Hb change, it was noted that the pre and post IV Iron Hb, Fe, ferritin, Iron saturation and postop Hb before discharge were all significantly higher in no Hb change group than raised in Hb group. This showed that those with mild anemia were expected to have less Hb change than those with moderate or severe anemia.
When compared the group with 1 dose vs. 2 doses of IV Iron given, it was noted that Hb in 2 doses group were significantly lower than 1 dose group. This showed that repeat blood tests 2 weeks after 1st dose of IV Iron was important especially in those with severe anemia as a 2nd dose could be given to them if the improvement in Hb level was suboptimal.
This study also included a close loop audit of the Pilot Quality Improvement Programme of our unit. We initiated this programme with the aim of optimizing anemia in colorectal cancer patients. The Multidisciplinary team set the goals at the beginning and 2 Audit cycles was carried out to evaluate the results. We noticed several issues after initiation of the programme especially low recruitment rate, low compliance rate to protocol in terms of blood taking and the time of IV Iron given after referral. The issues were identified after the 1st Audit cycle and changes were implemented accordingly. Also, timing and dosing are crucial for IV Iron therapy. Maximal Hb response usually takes 4-6 weeks and sometimes more than 1 dose is required with a maximum of 1 g weekly [5]. Thus we adjusted our protocol according to the evidence with 2nd doses given to patients with repeated Hb<8 or with anemic symptom.
After the 2nd Audit cycle the recruitment rate reached 100%. Though 3 patients had missing post IV Iron blood, the compliance rate to protocol much improved to 99% in terms of blood taking. 100% patients had IV Iron within 1 week of referral.
As strength of our study, the results suggest that IV Iron could be a viable treatment option for anemic colorectal cancer patients who may otherwise require blood transfusion. This is meaningful especially when there is a shortage of blood products worldwide and the demand is rising due to aging population [3,12]. The sustainability of the Hb level and marked reduction in anaemic symptom as shown in the study result can set a direction for future management of colorectal cancer patients postoperation.
Besides, it is the 1st Audit report on the IV Iron therapy as a Pilot programme in a surgical unit for optimization of anemia on Colorectal Cancer patients only. Previous Audit reports were on all surgical patients, not just specifically on Colorectal Cancer patients. This Audit showed that implementation of this programme was feasible and improvement of the programme could be attained throughout the Audit cycles. Also, all patients in our study were selected based on our protocol’s pre-specified eligibility criteria. This reduces variability and can be more informative to other departments which would also like to implement similar programme in the future.
The present study has several limitations that warrant acknowledgement. This study is a non-randomized study and is only a retrospective review with no comparison group. This will limit the interpretation of the results. Also the retrospective data from 2014-16 were not included for comparison due to lots of missing data. However these patients represent “real-life” clinical practice [1]. Although a recent Randomised controlled trial [9]. Showed preoperative IV Iron was not superior to placebo to reduce the need for blood transfusion when administered to patients with anemia 10-42 days before major abdominal surgery, included patients were not specific for colorectal cancer (operation for abdominal aortic aneurysm, gynaecological, upper gastrointestinal, urological and general surgeries were included. Future randomized controlled trial recruited for Colorectal Cancer only should be considered to aid to confirm our findings.
Besides, the assessment of anemic symptoms was performed by colorectal cancer surgeons only. It should be best performed by a validated patient-reported outcome instrument e.g. 36-item Short Form Health Survey to make the results more reliable [13-14].
In conclusion, our data demonstrates that preoperative IV Iron can help reduction of blood transfusion preoperatively. It can also raise the Hb and Iron profile. It also demonstrates the sustainability in terms of Hb level and improvement in anemic symptom. A close loop audit also demonstrates the feasibility of implementing this programme in optimizing anemia in colorectal cancer patients.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [Pubmed]